February 2009


I have said many times that architecture is defined by an experience that communicates an idea. This may be true, but I must admit that it is a shallow statement. It is eloquent in language to the world of architecture, but it serves no greater purpose than the idea itself. It cannot transcend the idea, and often it cannot even reach the ideal.

To the public eye, I may seem flippant. Even to those close, I may appear indifferent about architecture. But what many do not know is that this assumed flippant attitude is actually a calculated resolve. It is not that I don’t care or cannot achieve. It is not a potential not realized, but potential re-allocated. I understand the limits of architecture and trust in the extents of power.

To understand this most simply, it is best to use a logical analysis of architecture. As I have written before, architecture is about space that creates an experience which becomes the vehicle by which an idea is communicated. This is the deepest essence of philosophical architecture. The embodied idea could be about connection, metaphor, space, time, memory, or anything the philosophical mind can think of. And often this idea is rooted in the “spirit of the place.”

But can architecture embody the ideas of God? Most importantly, the gospel of Christ Jesus? Can man walk into a building, experience a space, and receive the gospel?

The answer must be an unequivocal no. (Unless, that is, the building includes the gospel engraved in a floor or written on a wall.) How could it ever be that man would receive the gospel by simply entering a place? The gospel has not been spoken and thus not communicated. In the temporal field, this question holds no weight. For in the temporal the philosophical nature of architecture is enough. The idea glorifies the architecture and points towards the architect, who may receive much glory.  There is no more needed of architecture in light of the temporal. It exists. One day it will fade away, and that is enough and good. However, what man must concern himself with is not the temporal, but the eternal.

In light of eternity, of what good is experience? It is of little use if it does not point the patron towards the cross at Calvary. More than good architecture, the gospel should be of concern to the regenerated architect. Thus architecture must take the form of service. We serve Christ as we serve our patrons. How much more worth is an architect who can serve and share the gospel than the architect that only concerns himself with design and good architecture. I do not denounce good design and architecture, but I put it in its place. Bettering society through the good use of materials and informed design is worthless and of no use in the eternity if the cross is not at the heart. So I say, an architect that serves the needs of the patron with the heart of the gospel is more valuable than the best designer to walk the earth.

If the servant architect worries himself on design and cannot function as needed for daily interaction, accountability, and fellowship, then he is failing to see the most important things in eternity. How can we love our God with all our soul, heart, mind and strength if we are drained, tired, and weak? Does architecture, the most influential of all arts, demand more than most occupations? Yes. But we must guard ourselves, less architecture and design become idols in our daily pursuits.

Architecture must be service oriented, and informed by a desire to share and live the gospel. For a building that is created without service interaction between architect and patron has no eternal value. The absence of the purposeful and intentful architect results in the absence of the gospel. The building is reduced to merely a temporal shelter. But a building created where service interaction results in a saved soul, that building becomes architecture that stands as testimony to the grace and glory of God! So of what good is architecture without a mindful architect? And of what good an architect without a merciful God?

So to those who see me as indifferent and with potential unapplied. Understand that there is a sense of resolve in my actions and decisions. I invest my potential into the things concerning Christ.

She dwells on His mercies,
and revels in His grace.

This is one of my favorite love letters to read during Valentines Day.  It was written by Jonathan Edwards to his future wife when he was 19 years old.

“They say there is a young lady in [New Haven] who is beloved of that great Being who made and rules the world, and that there are certain seasons in which this great Being, in some way or other invisible, comes to her and fills her mind with exceeding sweet delight, and that she hardly cares for anything, except to meditate on him—that she expects after a while to be received up where he is, to be raised up out of the world and caught up into heaven; being assured that he loves her too well to let her remain at a distance from him always. There she is to dwell with him, and to be ravished with his love and delight forever…. She has a strange sweetness in her mind, and singular purity in her affections; is most just and conscientious in all her conduct; and you could not persuade her to do anything wrong or sinful, if you would give her all the world, lest she should offend this great Being. She is of a wonderful sweetness, calmness and universal benevolence of mind; especially after this great God has manifested himself to her mind…. She loves to be alone, walking in the fields and groves, and seems to have someone invisible always conversing with her.”

I submit that I am the least humble guy I know.

God’s constantly conforming me the image of Christ, and sometimes my mind wears tired because of its finite faculties.  But man is it kind of God to not just leave us on our own. Struggling to do something right, but always messing it up.  Instead, He is active, and He is immutable.

He is kind to reveal sin and to tame my assertions.  I am the least equipped to write, but because of my love for Jesus Christ and him crucified, I hope I never stop writing and speaking the things of the cross. I just pray that I may become as a humble servant.

Soli Deo Gloria.

I have been writing for ManSpeak now for about a semester.  It has been truly a blessing.  God has used the opportunity to write, to engage my mind on the things of the heavenlies. 

Today I posted a really interesting topic that has been on my mind for a while.  The subject is beauty and the its mystery.  I want to say that beauty is the manifestation of the works of the Spirit and God’s creation. And that somehow, beauty creates this longing or desire in us for God.  It’s as if beauty is the physical realities of God which He uses to draw us to him.  However, in a perverse and twisted world, our desires often quickly become corrupt.  Yet still it seems that beauty screams the name of God. 

Check out my post and comment.  I titled it: The Mystery of Beauty.

Interesting thought:  can one not read what one sees?  Okay, not saying a different language, but for a language that you know, is it possible to not read words when we see them?  I don’t think I can just see the characters as strokes, I believe my mind always interprets them as words then translates it to an understanding of some sort.

So what does this mean?  Does it mean that I really can’t control my mind?  Truly, it is at least a testament to how fast the mind works, it seems to work instantaneously to which there is no time to stop it.  And if I cannot help but read words that I see, is that a sign of the power of words?

Some interesting thoughts, ehh?  Perhaps this has some deeper meaning.  If so, it really does bring scripture to light: words are powerful.  

“Death and life are in the power of the tongue…”  - Proverbs 18:21